|
|
Review of the EpoX 8KHA+ DDR Athlon
Motherboard
Last updated: 1/14/2002
PERFORMANCE. The 8kha+ with Windows XP installed
clocked an impressive Business Winstone 2001 of 50.4. The Content Creation
Winstone 2002 scored 27.7. Winbench 99 benchmarks were
also impressive.
Let's make an Apples and Oranges comparison with five simple
Wintune 98 benchmarks. This time such a comparison may actually be
relevant to our times/economy and provide some insight into what the average
prospective PC buyer/upgrader could expect from this AMD processor-based
motherboard as compared to some that have appeared over the last couple of
years. These benchmarks provide a rough comparison of computer technology
based on five AMD processors, four motherboard chipsets, the evolution and
increasing amounts of memory from 64 MBytes of 100 MHz PC100 to 256 MBytes
of PC2100 DDR memory, changes in hard disk drives, and the current migration
of the average PC from Windows 9x to Windows XP.
*The first number in the Abit KT7 memory read
test is comparable to those that went before it. The second number
is comparable to the tests with DDR memory that followed it.



Benchmarks mean different things to different people depending
on what they do with a computer, their experience, and how they interpret
the numbers. If you do a lot of number crunching and graphics for programming,
engineering, science, etc. or are addicted to games, any reasonable increase
of speed is probably significant.
One usually sees page after boring page of benchmarks in
many motherboard reviews. Often these benchmarks do not provide a clear
picture of what one can actually expect. Many of them are so focused
on competing products that they do not compare motherboards and systems that
are further separated in technology and time. In many cases, the real
differences in perceived performance, despite the benchmarks numbers, are
actually so small that they are almost insignificant to most computer users.
The Wintune 98 benchmarks are a step in the right
direction, but even these numbers do not completely depict what one will
perceive as a noticeable speed difference while sitting in front of a computer
with this motherboard as compared to competing products and others from generations
past. Perceived performance does not have a linear relationship to
the results of benchmarks tests. Benchmarks measure computers, not
human beings. If you are an average business/home computer user, you
would probably not see any noticeable difference in speed between this motherboard
and quality DDR motherboards using the most recent Athlon chipsets from competing
manufacturers. The speed difference between computer #3 in the Wintune
benchmarks and this one (#4) is not something I would call anywhere near
overwhelming as may be suggested by the numbers. On the other hand,
if you have an aging computer with 500 MHz K-6 processor, 64 MBytes of memory,
and a 5,400 RPM hard disk drive, or something like that (sell it now or forget
selling it), or a computer like computer #2 to a lesser extent, a computer
with this generation of motherboard, processor, memory, and hard disk drive
will probably make you start seriously thinking that maybe it's finally time
for a major upgrade or a new computer? Let me say, that it would be
wise to see a comparable computer for yourself and put your hands on it for
awhile before reading too much into these numbers (and others) and deciding
to do it. Click here for benchmark
details.
< Previous | Contents | Top | Next
- Web Site > |
|